Position Papers

The Office of Public Policy has sponsored a series of papers that provide the background to positions that the Center for Inquiry advocates on major issues. These papers are lengthy because they discuss the issues in depth, at a level more abstract than is possible in daily communication. They are listed below in alphabetical order. Each title is acccompanied by a summary of the position taken by CFI/OPP.

 

A Call to Legalize Physician Assistance in Dying for the Terminally Ill

Ronald A. Lindsay states the position of CFI/OPP that with appropriate safeguards, terminally ill patients should be allowed the help of physicians in dying. The argument is based on the experience of the Oregon Death with Dignity ACT (ODWA), which is appended to the paper.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

The Ethics of Genetic Engineering

David Koepsell summarizes arguments for and against genetic engineering and concludes that it should be understood as an extension of already well-accepted techniques and therefore, with appropriate regulations, the benefits of genetic engineering outweigh its harms.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

Global Climate Change Triggered By Global Warming

Stuart D. Jordan, argues that global warming is a scientifically established fact. Much could be done to mitigate its effects. The obstacles to action are political rather than technological.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

The Importance of Appropriate Sexuality Education

Gwen Brewer, Margaret Brown, and Michael Migdal argue for comprehensive education in human sexuality for adolescents, as opposed to “abstinence-until-marriage” education promoted by evangelicals and funded by the Bush administration.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

Protecting Scientific Integrity

Derek Araujo, Daniel Horowitz, and Ronald Lindsay confront the problem of ideological interference with the publication and dissemination of scientific research results and proposes specific language for legislation in three areas—scientific research, advisory boards, and dissemination of information.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

Protecting Scientific Integrity: An Update

Derek Araujo, Daniel Horowitz and Ronald A. Lindsay issue an update on the previous position paper.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

Public Health and Contraception

Margaret Brown argues that contraception should be considered a public health not a moral issue as religious groups have characteized it. The paper discusses recent developments in contraception, including the struggle to make Plan B available to anyone who needs an emergency contraceptive.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

Same-Sex Marriage—And Marriage

Ruth Mitchell sees same-sex marriage as a civil rights issue and argues that LGBT people have a right to complete equality. This means marriage, not civil unions, unless, as CFI advocates, all unions, heterosexual or homosexual, are civil unions, leaving religious ceremonies to individual taste.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

Stem Cell Research:  An Approach to Bioethics Based on Scientific Naturalism

Ronald Lindsay argues that embryonic stem cell research should be funded by the government because of its critical importance in the advancement of medicine.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

The True Meaning of the Establishment Clause

Edward Tabash provides a history of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and argues that this history requires the interpretation that government may not favor religion in generl or in particular.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF

Understanding The Intelligent Design Creationist Movement

Barbara Forrest was a witness in the Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District case in 2005. She establishes that “intelligent design” is jsut creationism in disguise and warns that the Discover Institute and fellow creationists will continue to invent ways to subvert the teaching of biology in the schools unless we remain true to the principles of free and critical thinking.

HTML | Adobe PDF iconPDF